Before Arbitration
If there is a manifest urgency, such as the other party attempting to sell the disputed property.
Securing your assets during a legal battle is often as important as winning the case itself. In India, Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is the “emergency exit” that allows parties to seek urgent judicial protection before, during, or even after an arbitral award is passed.
As we move through 2026, the Indian judiciary has become increasingly “pro-arbitration,” ensuring that Section 9 remains a powerful tool for businesses to prevent the dissipation of assets.
Section 9 empowers a party to approach a Commercial Court or a High Court to seek “interim measures of protection.”
These are temporary orders designed to preserve the status quo so that by the time you win your arbitration, there is actually something left to recover.
If there is a manifest urgency, such as the other party attempting to sell the disputed property.
Usually only if the relief available through the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17 is “inefficacious.”
After you win, but before the award is fully enforced, to ensure that the losing party does not hide their assets.
The courts have wide discretion under Section 9. Common orders include:
Stopping a party from terminating a contract or encashing a Bank Guarantee.
Ordering a party to deposit the disputed money in court or provide a bank guarantee.
Appointing a “Court Receiver” to take custody of disputed equipment, inventory, or property.
For minors or persons of unsound mind involved in the dispute.
A critical update from the 2015 Amendment, strictly enforced in 2025–2026, is Section 9(2). If a court grants you interim relief before the arbitration has started:
You must commence arbitral proceedings within 90 days from the date of the order.
If you fail to trigger the arbitration within this window, the interim protection automatically lapses, leaving your assets vulnerable.
A common point of confusion for clients is whether to go to Court under Section 9 or the Tribunal under Section 17.
| Feature | Section 9 (Court) | Section 17 (Tribunal) |
|---|---|---|
| Timing | Any stage: Pre, During, Post-Award | Only while the Tribunal exists |
| Power | Can pass orders against third parties | Generally only against parties to the contract |
| Speed | Highly effective for “Day 1” emergencies | Limited by the time taken to set up the Tribunal |
| Recent Trend | Courts now prefer parties go to the Tribunal once it is formed under Section 9(3) | Tribunal orders are now as enforceable as Court orders |
In recent rulings, including 2025–2026 High Court updates, the focus has shifted toward “Efficiency over Intervention.”
Indian courts are becoming more willing to secure the “entire claim amount” if there is a risk of the respondent turning into a “shell company.”
Even if your arbitration is in Singapore or London, you can still use Section 9 in India to freeze assets located in Mumbai, Delhi, or Bangalore, unless expressly excluded.
At MAP Law Firm, we understand that in commercial disputes, time is money. Our specialized Arbitration Team provides:
We move the High Courts for “Ex-parte” interim orders to stop immediate threats.
Crafting applications that meet the high threshold of “Prima Facie Case” and “Balance of Convenience.”
Transitioning your Section 9 win into a long-term victory.